nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 05, v.42 2-14+47
中药新药的性能评估:“三结合”证据体系作为中药监管科学新工具的重要作用
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email): zarmy@189.cn;
DOI: 10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20260428.002
发布时间: 2026-04-29
出版时间: 2026-04-29
网络发布时间: 2026-04-29
移动端阅读
摘要:

2010年国际上将药品监管科学的重点领域定为四个维度:安全、有效、质量和性能,强化药品综合性能评估成为贯穿药物全生命周期监管的新标杆。中药监管的本质就是全生命周期的获益-风险评估,中药监管科学新工具新方法在推进构建符合中药特点的审评审批体系发挥重要作用。2023年发布的中药监管科学定义,立足“安全、有效、质量、性能”多维评估整合理念,首次将性能纳入中药新药注册监管第四个核心评价维度,可以更好适配中药整体观、复方配伍、长期临床应用的特点,进一步强化了中药获益-风险评估(Benefit-risk assessment, BRA)的多元化系统性评估范式转变,反映出中西医药监管相互借鉴、协同发展的大势。近年发展起来“中医药理论、人用经验和临床试验相结合”(“三结合”)证据体系作为一种全新的、更具包容性与科学性的中药监管科学综合性能评估新工具,能够重塑中药新药从临床发现到注册上市的完整逻辑,驱动研发理念从“被动合规”向“主动价值创造”深刻转型。“三结合”可以作为中药新药性能评估的重要工具,在研发早期通过中医药理论及人用经验识别临床价值、评估前置风险,并依据证据强度灵活决定临床试验路径,实现“按需供给证据”的最优化决策,对于医疗机构新药研发、个性化临床研究设计、注册沟通交流及上市后动态评估,加快中药新药上市发挥重要作用。

Abstract:

In 2010,the international community identified four core dimensions as the key areas of pharmaceutical regulatory science: safety, efficacy, quality, and performance. Strengthening the comprehensive performance assessment of drugs has become a new benchmark for regulation throughout the entire drug life cycle. The essence of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) regulation lies in conducting benefit-risk assessments throughout the entire life cycle, and new tools and methods in TCM regulatory science play a crucial role in advancing the establishment of a review and approval system that conforms to the characteristics of TCM. The definition of TCM regulatory science published in 2023,based on the integrated concept of multi-dimensional assessment encompassing “safety, efficacy, quality, and performance”,incorporated “performance” as the fourth critical dimension for the registration and regulation of new TCM drugs for the first time. This better accommodates the holistic view, compound compatibility, and long-term clinical application characteristics of TCM,further reinforces the diversified and systematic paradigm shift in benefit-risk assessment(BRA) of TCM,and reflects the broader trend of mutual learning and coordinated development between Chinese and Western pharmaceutical regulation. In recent years, the “three-in-one” review evidence system(including TCM theory, human use experience, and clinical trials) has emerged as a novel, more inclusive, and scientifically sound new tool for comprehensive performance evaluation in TCM regulatory science. This system can reshape the complete logic of new TCM drug development from clinical discovery to registration and marketing, driving a profound transformation in research and development(R&D) philosophy from “passive compliance” to “active value creation”. The “three-in-one” system can serve as avital tool for performance assessment of new TCM drugs. In the early stages of R&D,it identifies clinical value and pre-assesses risks through TCM theory and human use experience, while flexibly determining the clinical trial pathways based on evidence strength, thereby achieving optimal decision-making with “on-demand evidence supply”. This system plays an important role in accelerating the market launch of new TCM drugs in areas such as new drug R&D in medical institutions, personalized clinical study design, registration communication, and post-marketing dynamic evaluation.

参考文献

[1]FDA Focus Areas of Regulatory Science-Introduction[EB/OL].(2023-10-05)[2026-02-20].https://www.fda.gov/science-research/focus-areas-regulatory-science-report/focus-areas-regulatory-science-introduction.

[2]EMA.Translating regulatory science into better processes [EB/OL].[2026-02-20].https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/presentation/presentation-translating-regulatory-science-better-processes-xavier-kurz_en.pdf.

[3]赵军宁,唐志书,华桦,等.我国中药科学监管体系构建与创新发展40年[J].中国中药杂志,2025,50(13):3489-3505.

[4]赵军宁.中药监管科学:助力更高水平的中药科学监管[J].中国药学杂志,2023,58(9):749-761.

[5]李东影,华桦,房军,等.中药获益-风险评估体系构建策略及其发展前瞻[J].中国中药杂志,2025,50(20):5896-5904.

[6]USP.United States Pharmacopeia (2022).General Chapter,<1090> Assessment of Drug Product Performance—Bioavailability,Bioequivalence,and Dissolution.USP-NF.Rockville,MD:United States Pharmacopeia[EB/OL].[2026-03-22].https://doi.usp.org/USPNF/USPNF_M99809_03_01.html.

[7]eCFR:21 CFR 516.3 ——定义[EB/OL].(2026-03-23) [2026-03-22].https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-E/part-516/subpart-A/section-516.3.

[8]ByLeon Shargel,Isadore Kanfer.Generic Drug Product Development [M]// Pradeep M.Sathe,John Duan,and Lawrence X.Yu.Drug Product Performance:In Vitro.Boca Raton:CRC Press,2013:184-203.

[9]Drug Product Performance,In Vivo:Bioavailability and Bioequivalence[EB/OL].(2021-07-05) [2026-03-23].https://www.niftylearn.com/image/catalog/PDF/RECORDED/LEON-0003.pdf.

[10]Javed Ali and Sanjula Baboota.Regulatory Affairs in the Pharmaceutical Industry[M]//Gulam Mustafa,Md Ali Mujtaba,Sabna Kotta,et al.Drug product performance and scale-up process approval changes[J].Salt Lake City:Academic Press,2022:215-240.

[11]Selen A,Dickinson P A,Müllertz A,et al.The biopharmaceutics risk assessment roadmap for optimizing clinical drug product performance[J].J Pharm Sci,2014,103(11):3377-3397.

[12]Singal A G,Higgins P D,Waljee A K.A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials[J].Clin Transl Gastroenterol,2014,5(1):e45.

[13]FDA.Benefit-Risk Considerations for Product Quality Assessments Guidance for Industry [EB/OL].(2022-05-10) [2026-03-23].https://www.fda.gov/media/158204/download.

[14]赵军宁,黄璐琦.中药监管科学:发展中的新兴融合科学[J].中国科学基金,2024,38(3):396-405.

[15]HUA H,TANG J Y,ZHAO J N,et al.From traditional medicine to modern medicine:the importance of TCM regulatory science (TCMRS) as an emerging discipline[J].Chin Med,2025,20(1):92.

[16]宋振光,颜冬梅,黄璐琦,等.中药药性——四气、五味、归经研究的方法学进展[J].江西中医药大学学报,2023,35(3):110-114.

[17]刘蓬蓬,刘婷婷,高慧,等.“中药炮制化学生物学”驱动的炮制前后中药性能变化科学内涵探析[J].药学学报,2026,61(1):29-36.DOI:10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-0664.

[18]张铁军,许浚,韩彦琪.中药五味药性理论现代研究思路与实践[J].药学学报,2026,61(1):1-10.DOI:10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1074.

[19]白钢,侯媛媛,姜民,等.基于化学生物学的中药药性-药效关联机制研究策略[J].药学学报,2026,61(1):11-20.DOI:10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-0520.

[20]王琦,王永炎,肖伟,等.“三结合”注册审评证据体系的定位及“人用经验”价值取向的专家共识[J].北京中医药大学学报,2025,48(4):445-450.

[21]郭敬,陈琳,佟琳,等.“三结合”审评证据体系下中药新药临床定位的思考与建议[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2024,30(8):1331-1336.

[22]宋彩梅,刘炳林,薛斐然,等.关于中药临床定位及疗效评价体系和标准的调研及思考[J].中国新药杂志,2021,30(10):898-901.

[23]国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心.与恶性肿瘤治疗相关中药新药复方制剂临床研发技术指导原则(试行)[EB/OL].(2023-04-14)[2026-02-13].https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/53fe81056937a6029663b48280a972c6.

[24]李俊彪.要“有故无殒”地理解十八反[J].新中医,1984,(4):49.

[25]庞晶瑶,柏兆方,牛明,等.基于“有故无殒”的何首乌对正常和肝损伤大鼠的毒性与保护作用对比研究[J].药学学报,2015,50(8):973-979.

[26]杨忠奇,唐雅琴,汤慧敏,等.试论中药人用经验资料收集、数据质量与证据形成[J].中国中药杂志,2021,46(7):1681-1685.

[27]杨忠奇,高蕊,胡思源,等.中药人用经验研究专家共识[J].中国中药杂志,2022,47(18):4829-4834.

[28]宋彩梅.关于“三结合”审评证据体系下中药新药临床研究路径及制定临床研究计划的思考[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2023,39(17):2581-2584.

[29]雷翔,赵晨,樊春英,等.中药新药“三结合”审评证据体系下探索性临床试验策略思考[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2026,50(1):1-6.

[30]路遥,王海南.浅析“三结合”审评证据体系对中药新药转化的作用[J].生物医学转化,2022,3(3):12-14,30.

[31]EMA.Benefit-risk methodology project Work package 4 report:Benefit-risk tools and processes[EB/OL].(2012-06-13)[2026-02-13].https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/benefit-risk-methodology-project-work-package-4-report-benefit-risk-tools-and-processes_en.pdf.

[32]魏芬芳,吴文宇,李丽敏,等.国外药品获益-风险评价方法概述与启示[J].中国药物警戒,2024,21(8):900.

[33]党海霞,刘骏,李兵,等.中成药价值评估指标体系研究[J].中国新药杂志,2021,30(11):961-970.

[34]刘福梅,张力,黎元元,等.医疗机构中药药物警戒体系建设指南[J].中国中药杂志,2024,49(16):4266-4272.

[35]李静,唐雪,黄勇,等.欧美日上市后药品风险控制措施介绍及对我国的启示[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2024,43(8):587-594.

[36]中药临床使用合理性评价与合理化改进专家组,金锐,李云.十八反、十九畏理论的分层分类认识及其用于临床安全风险评估的药学专家共识[J/OL].医药导报,1-20[2026-03-04].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1293.R.20240221.1243.002.

[37]鲁雨荍,路遥,李耿,等.“三结合”模式下中药新药研发的思考与实践[J].中国中药杂志,2025,50(7):1994-2000.

[38]LONG X,ZHANG J,YANG L.Promoting the development and approval of new traditional Chinese medicines in China:a pooled analysis of data from 2013 to 2024[J].Front Med (Lausanne),2025,12:1559703.

[39]Sethi S S,Bhardwaj T,Sethi S K,et al.Advancing herbal medicine safety:the need for a global pharmacovigilance approach[J].Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol,2025,398(10):13499-13514.

[40]LU K,XIE M,SUN W,et al.Evolution of traditional Chinese medicine registration review and approval policies:research based on the LDA topic model[J].Front Public Health,2025,13:1655636.

[41]CDISC.Traditional Chinese Medicine-Coronary Artery Disease-Angina Therapeutic Area User Guide v1.0[EB/OL].(2019-09-18)[2026-02-20].https://www.cdisc.org/standards/therapeutic-areas/traditional-chinese-medicine-coronary-artery-disease-angina/traditional.

[42]路遥,申琳,鲁雨荍,等.医疗机构基于“三结合”中药新药研发及管理体系的构建[J].中国药事,2024,38(2):147-151.

[43]Singh R,Zhou K,Auclair J R.Reimagining drug regulation in the age of AI:a framework for the AI-enabled Ecosystem for Therapeutics [J].Front Med (Lausanne),2025,12:1679611.

[44]黄哲,李美辰,施卉,等.基于全生命周期理念的中药新药监管科学研究[J].中草药,2021,52(17):5132-5138.

[45]路遥,王海南.从中药全生命周期审视真实世界研究的作用[J].中国新药杂志,2021,30(24):2225-2227.

[46]WHO.WHO traditional medicine strategy:2014-2023[EB/OL].(2013-05-13)[2026-02-20].https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506096.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20260428.002

中图分类号:R288

引用信息:

[1]李东影,华桦,房军,等.中药新药的性能评估:“三结合”证据体系作为中药监管科学新工具的重要作用[J].中药药理与临床,2026,42(05):2-14+47.DOI:10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20260428.002.

发布时间:

2026-04-29

出版时间:

2026-04-29

网络发布时间:

2026-04-29

检 索 高级检索